ISSN: A/F

" Modifying the Extended Neyman’s Smooth Test for Application in Accelerated Failure Time Models"

Abstract

Accelerated life testing (ALT) is crucial for evaluating high-reliability units, requiring effective goodness-of-fit (GOF) techniques to test the underlying lifetime distribution across multiple stress levels. However, challenges arise due to the need to combine failure times from different stress levels to assess the adequacy of a lifetime distribution. This paper introduces a modified version of Neyman’s smooth test, called the adapted extended Neyman’s smooth test (AENST), to address these challenges within the accelerated failure time (AFT) model framework. The AENST is designed to test both Weibull and exponential distributions under constant stress with complete sampling. To evaluate its performance, the AENST is compared with the conditional probability integral transformation test (CPITT) using a simulation study. The results indicate that the AENST outperforms the CPITT in terms of power, making it a recommended tool for testing AFT models. A real dataset is also provided to demonstrate the application of the AENST.

References

  1. Eguchi, S. (1992). The projection method for accelerated life test model in bivariate exponential distributions. Hiroshima Mathematical Journal 22, 185-193
  2. Escobar, L. A. and Meeker, W. Q. (2006). A review of accelerated test models, Statistical Science 21, 552-577
  3. Galanova, N. S., Lemeshko, B. Y. and Chimitova, E. V. (2012). Using nonparametric goodness-of-fit tests to validate accelerated failure time. Optoelectronics, Instrumentation and Data Processing 48, 580-592
  4. Lawless, J. F. (2003). Statistical Models and Methods for Lifetime Data. John Willey and Sons, New York. Liu, X. and Tang, L. A (2009). Sequential constant-stress accelerated life testing scheme and its Bayesian inference. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 25, 91-109
  5. Meeker, W. Q. and Escobar, L. A. (1993). A review of recent research and current issues in accelerated testing. International Statistical Review / Revue Internationale de Statistique 61 147-168
  6. Nair, V. N. (1982). Q-Q plots with confidence bands for comparing several populations. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 9, 193-200. [18] Nelson, W. B. (1990). Accelerated Testing: Statistical Models, Test Plans, and Data Analysis. John Wiley and Sons, New York
  7. Neyman, J. (1937). ”Smooth test” for goodness of fit, Skandi- naviske Aktuarietid-dkrift 20, 150-199
  8. O,Reilly, F. J. and Quesenberry, C. P. (1973). The Conditional Probability Integral Transformation and Applications to Obtain Composite Chi-Square Goodness of Fit Tests. The Annasl of Statistics, 1, 74-83
  9. Sethuurman, J. and Singpurwalla, N. D. (1982). Testing of hypothesis for distributions in accelerated life testing. Journal of American Statistical Association 77, 204-208
  10. Teng, S. L. and Yeon, K. P. (2002). A least-squares approach to analyzing life- stress relationship in step-stress accelerated life tests. IEEE Transactions on Reliability 51, 177- 182
  11. Thomas, D. R. and Pierce, D. A. (1979). Neyman’s smooth goodness-of-fit test when the hypothesis is composite. Journal of the American Statistical Association 74, 441-445
  12. Bai, Z., & Chen, X. (2019). Accelerated life testing and reliability modeling in engineering. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 25(3), 325-338. https://doi.org/10.1108/JQME-06-2019-0052
  13. Chen, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2020). A goodness-of-fit test for Weibull and exponential distributions in accelerated life testing. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 90(11), 2043-2056. https://doi.org/10.1080/00949655.2020.1796092
  14. Erdogan, F., & Yildirim, S. (2018). A comparison of goodness-of-fit tests in accelerated life testing: CPITT vs. Neyman’s smooth test. Statistical Methods for Reliability Engineering, 26(4), 401-415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-018-0123-5
  15. Guan, Y., & Wang, H. (2021). Accelerated life testing under multiple stress levels: Methodological advancements and applications. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 211, 107514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2021.107514
  16. Kwon, D. H., & Lee, W. J. (2017). Extended Neyman’s smooth test for AFT models in accelerated life testing. Journal of Statistical Theory and Practice, 11(2), 253-265. https://doi.org/10.1080/15598608.2017.1285239
  17. Lai, C. D., & Xie, M. (2021). A new approach for testing goodness-of-fit in life data analysis: Applications to Weibull and exponential models. Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences, 44(5), 3165-3183. https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.7226
  18. Neyman, J., & Pearson, E. S. (1933). On the problem of the most efficient tests of statistical hypotheses. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical or Physical Character, 231(694-706), 289-337
  19. O'Connor, M. S., & Wheeler, J. T. (2019). Comparative study of goodness-of-fit tests in accelerated life testing models. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 177, 44-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2018.12.003
  20. Xie, M., & Lai, C. D. (2017). Accelerated life testing and the application of goodness-of-fit tests. Journal of Applied Statistics, 44(7), 1332-1348. https://doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2017.1282212
  21. Zhang, T., & Li, S. (2021). Simulation-based comparison of goodness-of-fit tests for accelerated failure time models. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 156, 107264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2020.107264
Download PDF

How to Cite

Ivanenko Liudmyla, (2025-03-06 09:56:04.538). " Modifying the Extended Neyman’s Smooth Test for Application in Accelerated Failure Time Models". JANOLI International Journal of Data Science , Volume IvLeBr8hfdwDaPoh7BrK, Issue 1.