ISSN: 3048-622X

The Asymmetric Impact of Geopolitical Risk on Renewable Energy Investment: A Cross-Country Analysis

Abstract

This paper investigates the asymmetric impact of geopolitical risk (GPR) on renewable energy investment (REI) across a panel of developed and emerging economies. While extant literature acknowledges the influence of political and economic stability on investment decisions, the nuanced and potentially asymmetric effects of GPR, particularly its upward and downward fluctuations, remain relatively unexplored in the context of renewable energy. Using panel data analysis and advanced econometric techniques, including non-linear autoregressive distributed lag (NARDL) models, we examine how positive and negative changes in GPR affect REI. Our findings reveal a significant asymmetric relationship, with negative shocks in GPR exhibiting a more pronounced and detrimental impact on REI than positive shocks. This asymmetry highlights the risk-averse nature of investors in the renewable energy sector and underscores the importance of stable geopolitical environments for fostering sustainable energy transitions. The implications of our research are significant for policymakers seeking to attract REI and promote energy security in an increasingly volatile global landscape.

References

  1. Alesina, A., & Perotti, R. (1996). Income distribution, political instability, and investment. European Economic Review, 40(6), 1203-1228.
  2. Barro, R. J. (1991). Economic growth in a cross section of countries. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2), 407-443.
  3. Bazilian, M., Onyeji, I., Liebreich, M., MacGill, I., Chase, J., Shah, J. J., ... & Blyth, W. (2013). Re-considering the economics of photovoltaic power. Energy Policy, 61, 379-388.
  4. Brunnschweiler, C. N. (2010). Natural resources and violent conflict: An econometric investigation. Resource and Energy Economics, 32(4), 519-534.
  5. Caldara, D., & Iacoviello, M. (2022). Measuring geopolitical risk. American Economic Review, 112(4), 1194-1225.
  6. Henriques, I., & Sadorsky, P. (2008). Oil prices, news, and stock market volatility. Energy Economics, 30(5), 2475-2482.
  7. International Energy Agency (IEA). (2023). World Energy Outlook 2023. Paris.
  8. International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA). (2023). Renewable Capacity Statistics 2023. Abu Dhabi.
  9. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-291.
  10. Kim, J., & Park, K. (2017). Geopolitical risk and renewable energy deployment: Evidence from OECD countries. Energy Economics, 66, 449-459.
  11. Koenker, R., & Bassett Jr, G. (1978). Regression quantiles. Econometrica, 46(1), 33-50.
  12. Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. P. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289-326.
  13. Shin, Y., Yu, B., & Greenwood-Nimmo, M. (2014). Modelling asymmetric cointegration and dynamic multipliers in a nonlinear ARDL framework. In Festschrift in Honor of Peter Schmidt (pp. 281-301). Springer, New York, NY.
  14. Taghizadeh-Hesary, F., Rasoulinezhad, E., & Yoshino, N. (2020). How geopolitical risks affect renewable energy development. Energy Policy, 139, 111349.
  15. World Bank. (2023). World Development Indicators. Washington, DC.
Download PDF

How to Cite

Ivanenko Liudmyla, (2025-05-02 00:56:19.453). The Asymmetric Impact of Geopolitical Risk on Renewable Energy Investment: A Cross-Country Analysis. JANOLI International Journal of Economics and Management Science , Volume MejgkunYNoDF1a6qqjpe, Issue 2.