ISSN: 3048-622X

Navigating Volatility and Uncertainty: A Hybrid Forecasting Model for Strategic Investment Decisions in Emerging Markets

Abstract

Emerging markets present both significant opportunities and considerable challenges for investors. High growth potential is often coupled with increased volatility and uncertainty, demanding sophisticated forecasting models for informed investment decisions. This paper proposes a novel hybrid forecasting model that integrates the strengths of traditional econometric techniques, specifically Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity (GARCH), with machine learning algorithms, such as Random Forests, to predict asset returns in emerging markets. By combining GARCH's ability to capture volatility clustering with Random Forests' capacity for non-linear pattern recognition, the hybrid model aims to enhance forecasting accuracy and improve risk management. The model's performance is evaluated using historical data from a selection of emerging market indices, demonstrating its superior predictive power compared to benchmark models. The findings provide valuable insights for investors seeking to navigate the complexities of emerging market investments and make more strategic, data-driven decisions.

References

  1. 1. Baillie, R. T., & DeGennaro, R. P. (1990). Stock returns and volatility. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 25(2), 203-214
  2. 2. Ballings, M., Van den Poel, D., Hespeels, N., & Gryp, R. (2015). Evaluating multiple classifiers for stock price direction prediction. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(20), 7046-7056
  3. 3. Bollerslev, T. (1986). Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics, 31(3), 307-327
  4. 4. Booth, G. G., Martikainen, T., & Tse, Y. K. (1997). Modelling stock market volatility in emerging markets. Emerging Markets Review, 1(1), 9-20
  5. 5. Cao, L. J., & Tay, F. E. H. (2003). Support vector machine with adaptive parameters in financial time series forecasting. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 14(6), 1506-1518
  6. 6. Diebold, F. X., & Mariano, R. S. (1995). Comparing predictive accuracy. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 13(3), 253-263
  7. 7. Engle, R. F. (1982). Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom inflation. Econometrica, 50(4), 987-1007
  8. 8. Hansen, P. R., & Lunde, A. (2005). A forecast comparison of volatility models: Better than anything?. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 3(4), 532-573
  9. 9. Khashei, M., & Bijari, M. (2011). A novel hybridization of artificial neural networks and ARIMA models for time series forecasting. Applied Soft Computing, 11(2), 2664-2675
  10. 10. Lahmiri, S., & Boukhet, W. (2017). Hybrid GARCH-ANN model for forecasting stock market volatility. International Journal of Forecasting, 33(4), 1022-1031
  11. 11. Patel, J., Shah, S., Thakkar, P., & Kotecha, K. (2015). Predicting stock market index movement using machine learning techniques. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(6), 4579-4588
  12. 12. Wang, J., Wang, J., & Zhang, H. (2018). Stock market forecasting using a hybrid EMD-GARCH-SVM model. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 492, 666-677
  13. 13. Merton, R. C. (1980). On estimating the expected return on the market: An exploratory investigation. Journal of Financial Economics, 8(4), 323-361
  14. 14. Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1993). Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 33(1), 3-56
  15. 15. Pesaran, M. H., & Timmermann, A. (1995). Predictability of stock returns: Robustness and economic significance. Journal of Finance, 50(4), 1201-1228
Download PDF

How to Cite

Gnanzou, D., (2025-04-28 19:52:21.222). Navigating Volatility and Uncertainty: A Hybrid Forecasting Model for Strategic Investment Decisions in Emerging Markets. JANOLI International Journal of Economics and Management Science , Volume MejgkunYNoDF1a6qqjpe, Issue 1.