ISSN: A/F
JANOLI International Journal of
Human Resource and Management ( JIJHRM )
Login/Register
For Reference
About Journal Aim and Scope Editorial Board Publication Ethics Indexing And Abstracting Peer Review Process About Journal Aim and Scope Editorial Board Publication Ethics Indexing And Abstracting Peer Review Process

Leadership Dynamics in HR: Balancing Employee Well-being and Organizational Performance in Modern Enterprises

Authors: Leszek Ziora

Published: 2025/3/6

Download PDF

Abstract

This paper discusses the dynamics of HR leadership and how organizations balance employee well-being with performance objectives. It investigates strategies for harmonizing these priorities, focusing on definitions of well-being, performance metrics, integration strategies, cultural influences, and technological impacts. The study, which employed qualitative methods such as in-depth interviews with HR leaders and case studies of innovative organizations, identified five key findings: comprehensive well-being metrics, balanced performance evaluation frameworks, integrated well-being and performance strategies, adaptive cultural leadership, and ethical technological integration. The study therefore highlights the significance of cultural adaptability and ethical practices while presenting a holistic framework for HR leadership. Future studies should be extended to various industries and methodologies to test these results.

Keywords

Performance metrics, Qualitative research, Well-being frameworks, Adaptive leadership

References

  1. Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(7), 600-619.
  2. Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692-724.
  3. Gallup. (2021). State of the Global Workplace Report. Gallup, Inc.
  4. Towers Watson. (2012). Global Workforce Study: Engagement at Risk. Towers Watson.
  5. Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(1), 1-18.
  6. Becker, B. E., & Huselid, M. A. (1998). High performance work systems and firm performance: A synthesis of research and managerial implications. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 16, 53-101.
  7. Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(3), 293-315.
  8. Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. McGraw-Hill.
  9. Stone, D. L., & Deadrick, D. L. (2015). Challenges and opportunities affecting the future of human resource management. Human Resource Management Review, 25(2), 139-145.
  10. Wright, P. M., & Nishii, L. H. (2007). Strategic HRM and organizational behavior: Integrating multiple levels of analysis. CAHRS Working Paper Series.
Download PDF

How to Cite

Leszek Ziora, (2025/3/6). Leadership Dynamics in HR: Balancing Employee Well-being and Organizational Performance in Modern Enterprises. JANOLI International Journal of Human Resource and Management , Volume Po2nt0q2UKl3o9wLWfKz, Issue 1.

Follow Us
Get In Touch

Vitthal Namdev Nagar, Opp Jain Temple Sanganer Sanganer Bazar Jaipur 302029 Rajasthan (India)

mail@janolijournals.org

© JANOLI International Journal. All Rights Reserved.